Tulsi Gabbard, former Democratic congresswoman and military veteran, has cleared a key hurdle on her way to becoming the next Director of National Intelligence (DNI). The Senate Intelligence Committee voted 9-8 along strict party lines to advance her nomination to the full Senate, with all Republicans supporting her and all Democrats opposing her.
Gabbard’s nomination, submitted by President Donald Trump, has been polarizing due to her unconventional foreign policy positions and limited intelligence experience. Despite pushback, Republican senators have rallied behind her, arguing that her military service and independent approach to U.S. security issues make her well-suited for the role.
How Republicans Secured Her Advancement
Two critical votes came from Senators Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Todd Young (R-Ind.), who initially hesitated to support Gabbard. Both had concerns about her controversial past, including her meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in 2017 and her defence of whistleblower Edward Snowden. However, after private discussions and key commitments, both senators decided to back her nomination.
Todd Young cited her assurances on safeguarding classified information and her commitment to maintaining a balance between civil liberties and national security. “She has demonstrated that she will work within the established intelligence framework and uphold U.S. security interests,” Young said.
Democrats Warn of Potential Risks
Democrats on the committee strongly opposed Gabbard’s advancement, expressing concerns about her suitability for the top intelligence role. Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.) argued that her limited experience within intelligence agencies, combined with her controversial foreign policy decisions, could pose risks.
“She’s defended Edward Snowden, who leaked classified information and held meetings with leaders hostile to U.S. interests. That raises questions about her judgment,” Warner said during the hearing. He also stressed that the DNI must be a trusted figure who can manage sensitive national security matters without controversy.
Gabbard defended her record, stating that her past actions were aimed at promoting diplomacy and peace. She assured the committee that her focus as DNI would be on protecting the country and modernizing intelligence operations.
Next Stop: Full Senate Confirmation Vote
With committee approval, the nomination now heads to the full Senate for a final vote. Republicans currently hold a majority, making Gabbard’s confirmation likely unless unexpected defections occur. The full Senate vote is expected to take place in the coming weeks.
What Could Gabbard’s Appointment Mean for U.S. Intelligence?
If confirmed, Gabbard would oversee all 18 intelligence agencies, including the CIA and NSA. Her leadership could bring a shift in how the U.S. handles foreign threats and intelligence strategies. Supporters believe she will take a fresh approach to addressing modern security challenges, while critics warn that her unconventional views could create friction within the intelligence community.
As Gabbard prepares for her final confirmation vote, debate continues over whether she is the right fit to lead the nation’s intelligence apparatus.