In a fiery and unexpected comment, former President Donald Trump has suggested that the federal government should “take over” New York City and Washington, D.C. — a statement that has quickly drawn strong reactions across the political spectrum. His bold words have sparked a wave of concern, debate, and backlash nationwide.
During a recent speech, Trump criticized the conditions in both cities, calling them “out of control” and blaming local leadership for crime, homelessness, and disorder. He went on to say that if things don’t improve, the federal government should step in and take full control of their operations.
His remarks come at a time when crime rates, homelessness, and public dissatisfaction have become hot topics in both cities — but many experts believe his suggestion would face serious legal and constitutional challenges.
What Exactly Did Trump Say?
Speaking at a campaign-style rally, Trump said, “New York and Washington are disasters. They’re run by fools. Maybe it’s time for the federal government to take them over and fix them.”
He blamed Democratic leadership for turning “great American cities into crime zones,” and claimed that people are leaving these places in large numbers due to unsafe living conditions and high taxes.
While some of Trump’s supporters cheered the idea, critics quickly fired back, calling the comment dangerous, undemocratic, and unrealistic.
Can the Federal Government Really Take Over Cities?
Legal experts say the U.S. Constitution gives states and cities the right to govern themselves, meaning that a federal takeover is almost impossible without a national emergency or act of Congress.
Even in cases of disaster or unrest, federal involvement is limited and temporary. For example, the federal government can send aid, military support, or law enforcement help if requested — but can’t just take over city governments.
Several lawmakers, including both Democrats and Republicans, have spoken out against Trump’s suggestion, warning that such actions would break legal norms and democratic principles.
Political Reactions Pour In
Leaders from both New York City and Washington, D.C., strongly rejected Trump’s comments. NYC Mayor Eric Adams said, “Our city is not perfect, but we’re solving our problems ourselves — not with threats from former presidents.”
D.C. officials made similar statements, calling the idea “political theater” meant to stir fear and energize Trump’s base ahead of the 2024 election.
Meanwhile, some of Trump’s supporters defended him, saying he’s only expressing what many Americans are feeling about urban decay and lack of accountability.
What Happens Next?
While Trump has no current authority to act on his suggestion, it’s clear his message has made headlines and reignited debate about crime, city management, and federal power.
Analysts believe his comment was more symbolic than serious, aimed at making a strong statement about the condition of liberal-run cities and his plans to “restore order” if re-elected.
Whether or not this fuels his campaign or causes more controversy, one thing is certain — Trump knows how to dominate the spotlight.
